When reading Galen’s argument the overall wording and text of the paper was rather confusing. After rereading the paper I still count i used to be confused by his argument. However I understood the main point that his stance was rather controversial bringing up many different experts and their thoughts on the overall idea. Many of these experts were often the very opposite of Galens, in which he would go in detail arguing against and supporting ideas with evidence. I personally believe I have felt impeded by my life story. My life story I at one point believed I had set and was destined to do. This created a boxed way of life and directed my focus away from some things that may have been some interesting or fun opportunities. Some things that have a direct relation to being impeded by my life story is sticking with certain sports teams even without the love and dedication for the game anymore. I would believe that I couldn’t quit a sport that I no longer liked because I had been working my whole life with this and it was supposed to be my future. When discussing the ideas of multiple selves I believe I have only my singular self. This singular self however is very complicated and has many levels but not in the sense of different selves. Each of my own components work off each other and are intertwined with no actual specific  “different self”. I may react and act different ways but in the end I am a human being that as complicated as may be a single individual with one consciousness.