My second reading experience of See Through Words was very different compared to my first experience. During that first reading I struggled to really understand a lot of what the author was trying to argue and the key ideas he was trying to get across. Many of the metaphor were very hard to connect with like about the paintbrush being like a pump and the comparing of metaphors to a room. Reading through this again allowed me to take my time deciphering the text and gave me another chance to connect and understand the metaphors more in depth. Similar to my previous reading of the two different theories about metaphors and their structures I still came to the same conclusion, which was the metaphors are really dependent on dual-references and categorism. However, unlike my first experience reading and annotating the text I more clearly understood the other theory about the multistep process of metaphor design. After reading that for the second time I saw it much differently, but still ended up agreeing with the previous theory I had already understood. One very positive moment in my second reading experience when I came across the term pseudo-mistakes, which really confused me and my understanding of the concepts talked about in those couple paragraphs. I was then able to have a clear understanding of the couple paragraphs which I believe resulted in a more overall complete understanding of the whole. This second experience was very beneficial, and it is clear to see why multiple revisions and overviews should be made in any piece.           

Helpful Resource to help “Clear the Fog”-https://www.thefreedictionary.com/Psuedo